The Untold Truths About Vaccines And Why Pharmaceutical Companies Can’t Be Trusted

Vaccination has become a real issue lately, not only in the US but worldwide. The controversy is far from being over, as people seem to be separated into two sides when it comes to vaccination: those who approve of vaccines and those who oppose them. As a parent, choosing a side is a great responsibility, because, in this clash, only one side can be ultimately right. And the overall wellbeing of your children will depend on your choice. The first advocates for vaccination you’ll come across will be your local pediatrician, but don’t let yourself persuaded that easily. He’ll have nothing else in mind than your kid’s health, no doubt about that, but keep in mind that he’s the result of a medical system that has proven to be flawed before. And more so, the vaccination standards and regulations are all directed by the AMA (the American Medical Association). The obvious question is whose best interest does the AMA hold: that of our children or that of the pharmaceutical corporations (whose only purpose is financial profit)?

Shocking Facts About Vaccination That You Should Know

Throughout modern history, there have been several issues with many vaccines on the market. Those who claim otherwise are simply ignorant or ill-intentioned. RotaShield (the Rotavirus vaccine) falls into this category. It was removed from the market in late 1999 when it was demonstrated that there are links between bowel malfunction (obstruction, chaotic bowel twisting) and the vaccine itself. It was a great deal at the time, and the case is real as you clearly see for yourself here. The vaccine that followed (RotaTeq) was supposedly the new and improved version of the RotaShield vaccine. Although it doesn’t appear to be as destructive as its predecessor, it too seems to be causing bowel afflictions; you might find it hard to believe, but RotaTeq is still available on the market. Another famous and controversial case of vaccine malfunction has been recorded in February 2002, when GlaxoSmithKline (a preventive vaccine for Lyme Disease) has been withdrawn from the market. The manufacturer claimed poor sales, but the truth of the matter was that compelling evidence pointed out that the vaccine itself was responsible for worse cases of arthritis than the disease itself. You can read all about the untold truths about vaccines in this full report here.

In 2011, the I.O.M. (the Institute of Medicine), has submitted a report for further proof that certain vaccines can cause undeniable side effects. Their studies have shown that the Chickenpox Vaccine can afflict children with immunodeficiency (but not only) with hepatitis, meningitis, encephalitis or pneumonia. The Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccine favors encephalitis, febrile seizures and Arthralgia (Short-term joint pain) in women and children. The HPV vaccine seems to be the cause of anaphylaxis in yeast-sensitive females and as overall side-effects, all vaccines can cause syncopes (fainting) or arm inflammation.

Dangerous Chemicals And Compounds Found In Vaccines

When it comes to purchasing processed food or sodas or whatever else intended for human consumption, the first thing you should do is to not focus the price of the product, but in the ingredients section. A vaccine is no different. You should be very aware before administering such a drug to your child. Most vaccines (if not all) that are on the market contain many substances and chemicals that can be extremely harmful to a human being. These potentially harmful components and their terrible side-effects are not given the proper attention and respect, mainly because of the marketing policies that the pharmaceutical moguls impose. Here’s a list of some commonly found chemicals in vaccines:

• Formaldehyde is a carcinogenic fluid (used primarily in embalming corpses) that can cause respiratory distress, liver damage, reproductive deformation, gastrointestinal problems and various forms of cancer. Another flaw of this chemical is that it can neutralize the virus in the vaccine, which will make the vaccine completely useless.

• Thimerosal is basically mercury. Every vaccine contains about 25 mcg of Thimerosal, and according to the EPA, the safe limit for humans is about 5 mcg. It’s very neurotoxic and it’s been linked to autism.

• Aluminum phosphate it’s dangerous because it reacts to mercury and it increases its toxicity. Considering that every vaccine already contains about 25 mcg of mercury, the recommended dosage is exceeded from the go.

• Sodium chloride inhibits growth, prevents normal muscle contraction and affects the circulatory system.

• Monosodium glutamate (MSG) when injected, it becomes chemical unstable and turns into a neurotoxin; it’s been linked to brain damage in children and CNS (central nervous system) disorders.

• Phenoxyethanol can disrupt the central nervous system and can gravely affect the liver or kidneys.

• Glycerin is known for causing gastrointestinal damage, lung damage, liver and kidney shutdown.

• Bovine cow serum causes chest pain, low blood pressure, lupus, arthritis and can damage connective tissue.

These are only some of the most damaging chemicals used in a vaccine. The list is much longer, be sure of that.

So before considering vaccination (for yourself or your family), do some research first. Listen to both sides and make up your mind whether the shot is worth it or not. At the end of the day, the damage caused by the “cure” can be far greater than that of the affliction you’re trying to prevent. Stay safe, stay informed and don’t be fooled by advertisements.

A Brief Look Of The 1st And 2nd Amendments

It is infuriating the way a lot of people from Supreme Court Justices, lawyers, and ordinary people misinterpret these two amendments. I took it upon myself to set the record straight and at least give proponents of the 1st and 2nd Amendments some proverbial bullets for their gun. Pun intended.

To begin with, I will write the 1st Amendment here for the reader exactly as it was originally written and remains today;

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

Let’s begin by taking one part at a time. The first statement is, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,”

Let me ask you a question. When a State building or a Federal building has a stone statue on premises and they are told to remove it by a Judge, what law did Congress make? They made no law thus there argument and judgment are false. Now, if Congress were to make a law that stated to be a citizen of the United States and obtain gainful employment you must be a member of the Great Church of Universal Love then they would be 100% breaking the 1st Amendment.

Let’s continue; “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” As common sense dictates Congress has made no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof. As long as Congress doesn’t make a law there should be no legal issues. The problem is that lawyers have read too much into the 1st Amendment. The amendment does not in anyway say, Congress shall not respect an establishment of religion, does it? If that was the way it was written we could all understand the lawsuits that make people remove plaques and statues containing religious material.

Let us continue, “Congress shall make no law… or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; “ Webster’s Dictionary defines the word “abridge” as “to deprive, to reduce in scope, to shorten in duration or extent, or to shorten by omission of words… “. To my knowledge, there isn’t a great deal of problems with freedom of speech from a legal point of view but in recent times the media and others have done a fairly good job of squelching the opinions of the opposition being mainly the conservative voice. When public figures and popular media representatives laugh in derision over the oppositions view it causes many to remain silent. This has gone on forever I suppose but it has grown and gotten much worse in these modern times. No one likes to be mocked and publically ridiculed.

Continuing on, “Congress shall make no law… or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” I’ve noticed few problems with the right to peaceably assemble as long as you aren’t a public nuisance. But, as for the last part, does anyone know how to petition the government for redress of grievances? It actually is saying that we have the right to petition the government and make complaints or ask for assistance. How does one go about that? How do you get a politicians attention and complain about anything? You might possibly do that if you catch one on the campaign trail but we all know that the vast majority will say whatever and make promises that they do not intend on keeping once they get elected. We’ve seen it over and over until we are numb to their lying.

There is tremendous controversy over the 2nd Amendment. As in the 1st Amendment I will write it just as it was originally penned and the same way it remains today.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Again, breaking it down, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State… shall not be infringed.” Some of the power that was originally went to the Militia’s belonged to the State of their residence. The State was given the right to give rank to and train the Militia. The Militia’s were the National Guard of the day. Many Militias’ exist today but they are highly suspect by the politicians that impose tyranny on the masses. We continue, the “Militia… shall not be infringed”. Webster defines infringe as, “to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another”. Basically, the law states that when it comes to Militias’ you cannot encroach upon them in a way that violates the law pertaining to them or their rights. I find that definition fascinating and will leave the truth as it pertains to Militias to the Militias.

Okay, now for the part we’ve all been waiting for. Here it is;

“The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Common sense should be all that’s necessary on this one but let’s break it down anyway. “The right of the people” that’s you and me folks. “to keep and bear Arms” to “keep or own or possess and bear or carry Arms or Guns”. This simply says that people have the right to both own and carry guns. Look at it. Isn’t that what you see? To “keep” implies that it is mine as in mine to keep. To bear is to carry as in “Bear ye one another’s burdens”. Doesn’t that mean to carry one another’s burdens? Add to this very simple and clear statement, “shall not be infringed” and you have, “U.S. citizens have the unmistakable right to own and carry guns and this right will not be encroached upon or violated in anyway”.

I must admit that it feels good to clear the air on these amendments. I realize that my focus was more on certain sections in the amendments but I am of the opinion that that’s what the majority of people want to see.

Based on our interpretation using Webster’s Dictionary I think that the government owes “We the people” a big apology and to be given our rights back.

We learned or at least brushed up on the facts that those that sue others for displaying some religious symbol on State or Federal property should be counter sued with the Judge and Supreme Court Justices being counter sued also, or at least we should have the right to give them a wedgie as long as they revisit their stupid interpretations and fix the issue.

And to those who have been in power misinterpreting the Amendments of the Bill of Rights should maybe worry a tad since by law we have all been given the right to own and even carry guns and there is nothing they can do about it.

I’m just having a little fun but in reality, I’m extremely serious about our Constitutional rights. Barack Obama and many others are continually trying to take our guns away from us but that will never happen here the U.S.A., at least not without a fight. In the word’s of Patrick Henry, “Give me liberty or give me death!” When it comes to gun ownership let that be our motto!

The $43 Trillion Bankster Lawsuit And The Mysterious Murder Of Two NY Toddlers

Last week, a horrific scene was discovered in a Manhattan apartment as the mother of two toddlers found her children dead in a bathtub and the nanny who was supposed to be caring for them began stabbing herself.

Marina Krim, the wife of Kevin Krim senior vice president and general manager of digital media at CNBC, had entrusted the care of her two small children to Yoselyn Ortega, a newly naturalized US citizen from the Dominican Republic. Ortega had worked for the Krim family for just 2 years before this violent incident.

Although the New York City Police Department (NYPD) has not been able to interview Ortega because she apparently slashed her own throat and slit her wrists, she remains the main suspect in the slaying of the Krim’s 2-year-old son and 6-year-old daughter.

Just prior to the murders, Ortega had begun seeing a psychologist. After investigations into Ortega’s background, there were no criminal records and no history of psychiatric issues. Yet those closest to Ortega told the NYPD that she had suddenly lost a considerable amount of weight and was showing visible signs of stress.

According to Paul Browne, spokesman for the NYPD explains that: “Apparently over the last month she was not herself. There were financial concerns. She was seeking professional help and people noticed she wasn’t herself.” Other reports about Ortega’s mental state in the weeks prior to the murders reveal that she felt as though she were losing her mind. Ortega also had some financial difficulties which forced her out of her apartment with her son in the Bronx and led to her moving in with her sister in Harlem. Yet despite these reports, Ortega never showed signs of personal problems with the Krim family.

Raymond Kelly, an NYPD police commissioner, confirmed that Ortega was in a medically induced coma at the Weil Medical Center, which rendered her unable to speak with police. The NYPD are baffled as to why this beloved nanny would brutally murder her two charges.

Charlotte Friedman, a neighbor who lived in the same building remarked that Ortega “looked normal” just prior to the murders. “She had a poker face. There was no indication that something like this was going to happen.” Freidman went on to say that Ortega “She wasn’t warm. Usually, when you smile at a nanny and the kids, the nanny smiles back. It’s instinctive. But she had a poker face. I didn’t get the sense she was evil, just cold.”

Earlier this month, Scott Cohn, a correspondent for CNBC, reports on a lawsuit filed by Eric Schneiderman, one of 10 New York State Attorney General citing JPMorgan Chase as profiteering from the mortgage-back securities which led to the stock market crash of 2008. Since Schneiderman filed the suit, eleven US prosecutors and 3 attorneys with the Civil Division of the Justice Department have assisted in the cases’ development for the purposes of using the lawsuit for future reference against other Wall Street financial firms.

In January of this year, Krim was employed by JPMorgan Chase as a strategy consultant for only 3 months. This happened just prior to his employment with CNBC.

According to court documents regarding the lawsuit, the purpose of seeking a legal remedy is:

1. The deceptive coercive methods employed by mega-banks to facilitate injured parties’ participation in loans and mortgages

2. The fraudulent and illegal use of MERS

3. Breach of plaintiff’s statutory rights

4. Purposeful violation of consumer and homeowner protect statues

5. Processing money from unknown sources in contravention of the Patriot Act of 2001

6. Foreclosing upon and accepting monies for assets that do not exist

The lawsuit states that there was a “systemic fraud on thousands of investors” concerning the mortgage-backed securities first purvey by Bear Stearns, who was later acquired by JPMorgan Chase as part of the US governmental bailout of the banks after the 2008 crash. These securities were sold, according to the lawsuit, willfully and with intent by the seller to defraud and deceive investors. Because the securities were a combination of home mortgages, credit card debt and student loans which were bundled together and sold on the global markets after given a fake triple-A rating.

Some of the mega-banks named in the lawsuit are:

• JPMorgan Chase

• Wells Fargo

• Wachovia

• Citigroup

• US Bancorp

• Ally Financial

• GM Acceptance Corporation

• One West (owned by George Soros)

• HSBC

• Deutsche Bank

• PNC Bank

• Bank of America

• Bear Stearns

Many foreign and overseas banks were named in the suit in conjunction with the mega-banks – pointing to the fact that financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and others were using offshore banks to hide their monies acquired by the mortgage-backed securities scam. In essence, these financial institutions took monies from mortgage-holders, funneled it to offshore bank accounts and then after securitizing the loans, took the actual property from the individuals.

The complaint states that the Ponzi scheme concocted by the banksters was “the largest scheme in US history where domestic banking institutions – on an international basis” conspired together with the common purpose of engaging in a “worldwide scheme to steal, rob and convert the personal property, money, and proceeds of such assets of each Plaintiff herein” with the obvious purpose of a conspiratorial “decade-long systematic conversion . . . that damaged millions of borrowers across the US.”

This massive money laundering scheme was fostered by the Obama administration who gave the biggest bailout to the technocrats in the US. Indeed, Bank of America is instrumental in prospects that involved foreign countries in the largest global Ponzi scheme with the intention to steal and covert billions of dollars from millions of homeowners across America.

This lawsuit and the tragic death of two children are connected. The truth of this lawsuit would bring down the greatest financial hoax of this century. The technocrats are willing to murder two innocent babies of a man who published the lawsuit on CNBC because keeping the truth hidden is worth more to them than the lives of anyone possibly connected to the truth.

Pay attention to the developments of this lawsuit. This may be our diamond in the rough.

By Sussane Posel

www.occupycorporatism.com